Low Graphics Version
Monday, May 21, 2012
In the CityCalendarsServicesCity OfficeF.A.Q.sContact UsIndex & Help
Homepage > ... > Heart of the City Specific Plan > Archived Information Regarding the Heart of the City Specific Plan > Urban Land Institute Report E-mail storyPrint friendly format

ULI Panel Final Report

In March, 2000, the City enlisted the services of the Urban Land Institute's Advisory Services Panel to evaluate the potential of the Heart of the City study area.

The ULI Panel held its Final Presentation on the morning of March 10, 2000 at the Crowne Plaza Hotel (300 N. Harbor Drive).  The large crowd of 200+ viewed the Panel's recommendations for land use and re-use in the study area (the AES Generating Station, the Harbor and Pier areas, and the west side of N. Catalina Avenue).  Fortunately, the Presentation was recorded and can be viewed at the City Clerk's Office (City Hall, Door "C"), or purchased for $15.

l Full Report (.pdf) (553k) (this file requires Adobe Acrobat Reader)

l Report Summary (below)


Report Summary

In summary, the Panel encouraged more public space, a more efficient and pedestrian-friendly use of N. Harbor Drive, the creation of a "Catalina Corridor" entry to the Harbor, and effective use of the AES Generating Station to provide complementary uses and better access to the Harbor, the development of "entry" points to the Harbor, and a landscape corridor from City Hall to the Harbor via Plaza Park.

Four sketches of their recommendations were unveiled and are presented here:

ULIpres1.jpg (235377 bytes)

"Catalina Corridor"

ULIpres2.jpg (247839 bytes)

"Harbor Corridor"

ULIpres3.jpg (234081 bytes)

"AES Property"

ULIpres4.jpg (262006 bytes)

"Thematic Corridors"

(click on images for larger views)

It is important to note that the Panel's recommendations are not final.  However, their recommendations will serve as the basis for future Community Workshops regarding amendments to the City's General Plan, Harbor/Civic Center Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance.  The City is now in the process of  holding several Community Workshops and hearings to allow for public review and comment.

The Panel's outline of final recommendations is presented below.


ULI Advisory Panel - Summary of Observations and Design/Revitalization Recommendations Worksheet

OBSERVATIONS - PROBLEMS & OPPORTUNITIES:

Problems:

  1. Redondo Beach is not benefiting from its waterfront as much as in other beach cities to the north.
  2. No sense of entry to waterfront from PCH; Catalina Avenue area feels like rear end of the power plant.
  3. Weak identity and lack of "sense of place" or of a destination for the study area.
  4. Harbor Drive is not a pedestrian-friendly route, and is awkward as an auto route southbound.
  5. Bicycle and pedestrian circulation constraints include:
    1. The Strand is cut off in both north and south ends of the study area.
    2. The Rail "Green Belt" from Hermosa Beach is cut off.
  6. The waterfront is inactive and dysfunctional:
    1. The waterfront feels inaccessible from Harbor Drive out to waterfront and into the marina, due to obstructions created by parking lots, fences, walls, and gated roadways.
    2. Dysfunctional land uses and conflicts between marina uses result in underutilized marina facilities.
    3. Marina users have conflicts with tourists and recreational users.

Primary Opportunities:

  1. Upgrade City image/character by remedying shortsighted land use and development decisions of past years.
  2. Enhance quality of life and economic future by building upon and improving the waterfront, the key asset.
  3. Leverage the waterfront amenity to attract new destination uses to anchor the Heart of the City and to raise the quality of development and quality of life of residents.
  4. Reconnect Redondo Beach citizens back to their waterfront. Open up views and pathways that connect the waterfront back up to Catalina Ave., PCH and the rest of the community.
  5. Rather than developing the separate parts of the study area as isolated projects, reconnect them into a dynamic "Heart of the City" district.
  6. Use the AES site as an economic catalyst to revitalize the district.
  7. Change the lackluster pedestrian experience of Harbor Drive & waterfront into an exciting sequence of public spaces.
  8. Recapture leakage of shopping and restaurant customers to other communities by providing fine dining, entertainment and destination uses that make the most of the waterfront amenity.

SUMMARY OF DESIGN/REVITALIZATION IDEAS PUT FORWARD BY THE ULI ADVISORY PANEL TO ACHIEVE THE VISION OF THE HEART OF THE CITY:

ULI recommends grouping the various improvement projects into Three Thematic Street Corridors to Revitalize the Heart of the City:
 

I. Catalina Entry Corridor
A. Gateway:
1. Make a major entry statement on Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) - "The Redondo Roundabout" with landscaping and directional signing, creating a district portal leading down the hill to the water.
   
B. Streetscape:
1. Connecting Sequence.  Improve Catalina Corridor from PCH to Beryl and down Beryl to Harbor, designed to connect from PCH to the Waterfront.
2. Design Improvements. Transform the auto-dominated roadway into a high quality public space with impressive landscaping, better lighting, on-street parking, slower traffic, and attractive sidewalks.
3. Arrival Point. Culminate the boulevard at "Catalina Circle" (presently Beryl/Harbor Drive intersection) and connect to a new landmark fountain and beachfront park (see "Waterfront," below).
   
C. New Development:
1. Create a new neighborhood in previously undefined part of town. Use infill and redevelopment on underutilized properties along the corridor with human-scaled, townlike local serving developments.
2. Over time, encourage the shopping center and other businesses to open storefronts oriented towards Catalina Avenue.
   
II. Coastal Corridor
A. Harbor Drive Streetscape
1. Redesign Harbor Drive as "street of character" with traffic calming, landscaping, and pedestrian amenity.
2. Create an attractive rotary at the intersection of Beryl and Harbor Drive (see "Catalina Circle" in Catalina Corridor section, above). The circle will serve as a distributor for people going to the pier, the marinas and the new Town Green.
   
B. AES Site
1. Encourage private investment to support and activate the Heart of the City:
  a) Retain NavCom as a growing local business.
b) Enable retail, residential, office and commercial uses on AES site (and other underutilized properties east of Harbor Drive). Use a community workshop process and implement via a Heart of the City Specific Plan to leverage the large site to create substantial community benefit.
c) Create Destination Uses. Investigate leveraging the waterfront location to attract a five-start hotel and/or public market like Pike Place Market in Seattle.
  d) Promote mixed-use residential and live-work residential rather than typical condominium development in appropriate areas.
2. Do not allow superblock development: extend existing local streets through the AES site, connecting neighborhoods to the waterfront.
3. New View Corridors. Create and preserve views from Catalina through to the water. Prohibit buildings from obstructing view corridors.
4. Pedestrian Scale Added. Treat architecture and landscaping of the existing "Whaling Wall" building to create pleasing scale and integration with the Harbor Drive streetscape.
5. Hermosa Greenway. Extend Hermosa Greenway into the City and through the AES site all the way through to Beryl and down to the waterfront.
6. Harbor Drive frontage improved as part of site development plan - traffic calming, street improvements - see "Harbor Drive" above.
   
C. Harbor Area
1. Street edge: Reconfigure the existing dispersed pattern of retail and restaurant development into compact and walkable clusters along Harbor Drive, with ground-level specialty shops, restaurants and other small-scale businesses fronting onto the street.
2. New Investment. Enable retail, entertainment, fine dining and lodging development on underutilized land west of Harbor Drive, with additional small-scale office uses on second and upper floors. Leverage waterfront amenity to attract fine dining and perhaps a public market and a five-star resort hotel.
3. Public Space. New public space including a Town Green with an interactive fountain and a new nautilus-shaped 200-foot public beach; Retain and enhance Seaside Lagoon.
4. View Corridor. Open the view out across the breakwater with a focal element at the end of the breakwater.
5. Pier area reconfiguration: Activate the waterfront by eliminating barriers to continuous public access while keeping in mind the need for safety and security.
  a) Extend the Strand continuously along the water edge.
  b) Consolidate marina activities by grouping them compatibly.
  c) Restore connection to the water by creating access onto the breakwater for strolling, views, and fishing.
  d) Expand the area of Mole B to 4-5 acres. Move the Yacht Club onto Mole B along with their own basin.
  e) Improve Marina Way by removing center parking aisle and creating a landscaped public bicycle and pedestrian access way.
  f) Permit the development of new restaurants that cantilever over the seawall and are accessed via ramp structures. Use these ramps as a grade separation for bicycle path.
  g) Create a bridge structure to link the Strand to the Pier and route the bike path around the pier.
  h) Modify Basin 3 to provide public access to the docks via a floating promenade walkway. Consolidate rental activities in this area. Open the area for exhibits and shows.
  i) Replace some existing slips with larger and better quality slips; develop transient slips as well.
   
D. Parking
1. Reconfigure existing parking lots to be shared in time (e.g. used by office workers in the daytime and marina diners and nightlife patrons in the evening) and shared in space (consolidate small privatized lots for greater efficiency).
2. Add curbside parking to both sides of Harbor Drive.
3. Potential on AES site to provide some public parking facilities as well as multiple day-evening use of parking facilities.
4. Consider remote-parking opportunities in some areas that are currently underutilized, e.g. underneath the power lines.
   
III. Civic Corridor
A. Create a park-like campus setting for civic center, with linear greenway extending from civic center to the waterfront lined by future civic buildings.
B. Consider limited residential land acquisition between Broadway and Catalina as well as mid-block pedestrian stoplights to complete the connection between City Hall and the waterfront.
   

Comments
If you would like to share your comments or ideas on the above or on the project, we can be reached here.
   

 

 

Privacy Policy

 

Top 
Copyright © 2001-2008, City of Redondo Beach

Powered by Civica Software